The other day, I got a question from Laurie from Dog Hair in my Coffee because she wanted to know something about the what’s and why’s of our system with a Migration board, Court and Migration Court of Appeal.
I’ll try and explain it all without this becoming a dissertation that not a single person will be able to muddle through.
Some background:
Sweden has been known as a country with fairly benevolent regulations concerning people seeking refugee status or asylum here. Previously, this was definitely true – as evidenced by the number of persons from various countries who has obtained permanent status here during the last 50 years or so. In the 50’s Sweden welcomed a number of persons from Hungary, after 1968 they came from Czechoslovakia, in the 70’s from Chile, during the next decade or so from Turkey and during the 90’s from the former Yugoslavia and other Eastern bloc countries. The process was fairly straight forward, people came here and were allowed to start a new life. I might add that in those days, Sweden needed young and strong people, willing to work for low wages…
During the last decade, there has been a significant change in attitude, though. This is however something that people in countries torn asunder by war, buckling under inhuman dictatorships or those living under other horrendous circumstances, have not been aware of. On the contrary, at the beginning of numerous “underground railways” the word has been that once you arrive in Sweden, you’d be practically home-free. Unfortunately, there has been some nasty changes in policy – at least if you ask me.
Iraqi citizens are (almost summarily) denied visas because Swedish authorities have decided that there is “no armed conflict” in the country.
Persons hailing from countries like Libya had better be able to show evidence of torture if they hope to stay here…
The Migration Board will deem someone “stateless” and yet try and deport them to the country they were in before arriving here.
Some decisions handed down by the Migration Board defies logic – such as the one given my youth, -W-. Such as all other children they have denied asylum or refugee status. Such as deporting families who have lived in the country for years and years while their case has gone through the mill… (However, we no longer need workers from other countries…)
In recent years there has been quite a few children (mostly boys) between roughly 13 and 16 who have arrived here on their own. Sometimes they are called “anchor children” as they are believed to have been sent here for a reason. If they obtain permanent status in the country, they can apply for their families to be granted visas. I’m sure some of them came here for that reason – but I think the majority left their native country for other reasons. Like so many of the boys here have said “Do you think I’d leave my home country and my family, if I had a future there?”.
When they arrive in Sweden, they are processed in one of the bigger cities in the south and then placed in a county that has agreed to welcome “unattended minors” while their case is tried. The Migration Board will then interview the child two or three times with a lawyer and an interpreter in attendance. The questions may seem fairly straightforward but some of them are definitely posed in an effort to make the person contradict themselves. If the result is that the person is not granted a visa, an appeal is made to the Migration Court and the whole process sort of starts all over. Most of the time, the Court will make a decision without hearing the person “personally” – but about 20% are actually called to the proceedings and allowed to present their case. Another negative answer leaves a final option – appealing to the Migration Appeal Court – where a limited number of cases are tried.
I’m sure I haven’t been able to explain all of this properly so if anyone reading this feels even more confused now – keep on asking questions and I’ll do my best to answer them!










